Gainako Newspaper

As a laid down my pen, and look at the night sky I cannot help but be reminded of the prophecy of Papa
Africanus who centuries ago threw his beads on the naked earth, and in a frenzy point to the sea and
foretold the coming of the white men. He wept for days for he has seen in a vision the strife and sufferings
that is about to befall his beloved continent, AFRICA

Europeans once described Africa as the Dark Continent characterized by the
bleak wilderness and barbarism of her own people. While this view, today in this
era of political correctness is totally unacceptable. However this was the prevalent
theory at the time. The vast majority of Europeans, never set foot on the African
continent, yet accept this view as a fact.

Explorers that visited and ventures into the hinterland return to Europe with long tales of exotic animals
and describing Africans running wild. They portrayed the people as savages that indulge in bizarre
rituals. Other accounts portrayed the people as uncivilized and even practice human sacrifice and
cannibalism, a perfect excuse or pretext for colonialism. Some even describe colonialism as bringing
the word of God to the African heathens. Today this view has long been relegated to the dust of
history, However remnants of this prejudice occasionally surfaces in the western media. This is true
especially when reporting on issues such as civil strife, aids, and famine in Africa.

In the post colonial era, the continent did enjoy some degree of tranquility. However within a few
years after independence many African countries were ravaged by military coups, civil unrest, and
endemic and chronic corruptions. In many cases this could be attributed to monumental failures of
leadership. The reign Mobutu Sesoko of Zaire, Houphiet Boigne of Ivory Coast, and Jean-B�del
Bokassaa of Central Africa are glaring examples of leadership that have failed its people just to name
a few. These leaders succeeded in clinging to power for decades without any vision for the future.
Their primary goal was to entrench themselves at the helm of government indefinitely. In doing so
allow nepotism to creep, undermine the rule of law and allow corrupt practices to grow like cancer to
an extent that the government eventually implodes. These men while in power never allow institutions
especially democratic ones to flourished. Never allow a smooth changed in leadership. Theirs was
simply a dictatorship of the oligarchy whose only contribution to nation building is organizing farce
elections that provides the appearance of democracy. This led to wide spread looting of the state by
members of the ruling elites. Some eventually degenerate into civil unrest and or all out civil war. The
leadership of Leopold Sedat Senghore is a rare example of true leadership. He set a precedent by
establishing a peaceful transition of power that led to three successive administrations leading Senegal.
His is like a glittering diamond amongst a sea of unpolished stones.

In other cases the actions of the former colonial masters exacerbates an already volatile situation. They
ensure the newly independent states are intricately linked with the former colonial masters through
trade deals, defense pacts, and other bilateral agreements. While this may sound reasonable but it
allows undue influence on the domestic politics of these former colonies.. A prime example is the
actions of the Belgians in the Congo, the French in Algeria, the Portuguese in Guinea Bissau, and
Angola. The current crisis in Zimbabwe owed its roots to land grabbing by the colonialist generations
earlier. African leaders such as Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Patrice Lumumba of Congo, Nelson
Mandela of South Africa, and Thomas Sankara of Burkina Faso who had a different idea were either
deposed by a military coup, assassinated, jail or sent into exile all with tacit western support. Their
only crime to put it simply was " putting the African interest first ".

Today herald the dawn of globalization, the emergence of capital that prides itself not knowing any
borders but only profit. This new gospel is seen taken place in China, Malaysia, India and other parts
of the world. Yet Africa, the largest continent in the world is still unable to see the transfer of capital
and technology. The question is why? This can be attributed to many things. First Investors still
considers most part of Africa unstable and therefore a risky investment for CAPITAL. It is a fact that
all investors foreign and domestic are conversant about the abundant cheap labor in Africa. Even the
favorable weather conditions could be enticing. However local corruptions, in the form of bribes to
government officials does dissuade many potential investors. While individual countries can overcome
most of these shortcomings in the short term the long-term viability of huge investment is always
questionable. For investor's worse nightmare is civil strife, wars and general break down in law and
order. These are the huddles that need to be address. In countries like Ghana, and South Africa, we
have seen some foreign investment coming in. However this is minute compared to the overall potential
that the continent can offer.

The decision to held 2010 world cup in south Africa while applaudable is another instance of the
realization by the global community of the need to level the playing field. In this respect a world cup in
Africa is a good start especially in a sport that is truly universal. The alleged comment by the FIFA
official on the possibility of an alternative venue for the game in the event something goes wrong in
South Africa does remind me of the incident in Nigeria several years ago when a reported disease
outbreak led to the cancellations of the youth world cup. I hope that Africa will not have to endure
another re-run of the Nigeria incident artificial or otherwise. Having said this is also incumbent upon
South Africa to provide an excellent service, a memorable event for all to enjoyed and proud of. To
ensure the event is well prepared and well catered for. Failure is not an option.

On the question why there is no African state in the permanent membership of the United Nation
Security Council, a little history might perhaps explain the rational for the current status quo. At the
end of the World War II the victorious allied powers, dictate the term of the peace, established the
United Nations and of course becomes the custodian of global security. This is clearly manifest in the
UN charter which reads " to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice
in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, " While times have changed since 1945, but
a global institution like the U.N takes time to adjust to changing times. The composition of the
permanent members is not likely to changed any time soon unless their is a radical change in the world
order as we know it.

As a laid down my pen, and look at the night sky I cannot help but be reminded of the prophecy of
Papa Africanus who centuries ago threw his beads on the naked earth, and in a frenzy point to the
sea and foretold the coming of the white men. He wept for days for he has seen in a vision the strife
and sufferings that is about to befall his beloved continent. A proud people that built the great empires
of Ghana, Mali and Shongai. A culture that established the renown center of learning at Timbuktu
where architecture, astronomy, mathematics, art and music greatly flourished.

Momodou Laama Jallow
North Carolina, USA

..........AFRICA
....Why Art Thou Forsaken Me?
................... By Momodou Lamin Drammeh..........................May 3rd, 2007

In this interesting piece Writer Momodou lamin Drammeh laments on the sorry state of his
beloved continent Africa. In the process raised some fundamental questions that demands
a critical re-examination of a whole range of pertinent issues across the whole continent.
A pre-requisite necessary in the continent's quest to takes its rightful place in the 21st century.

I am African and proud of it, however, it bothers me a lot that to see how my
beloved continent is being neglected and sidelined, or should I say disregarded
by the world's economic and political power players.

In the last two decades or so, we've seen the world's manufacturing, Technology, pharmaceutical and
even service companies moving their operations from the Americas and Europe to China, India, and
other parts of the world, mainly Asia, in search of cheaper labor. I don't blame them because every
investor wants the most return for his or her investment. What bothers me is the fact that none or very
few of these companies are heading to Africa. Are they simply ignoring us, or is our continent not
stable enough to attract the confidence of these investors? Or are our leaders not doing enough to
persuade such investors to see the potential cheap labor market and human resources available in
Africa? Unemployment rates in all African countries are in the double digits, and China or Asia in
general is not more accessible in terms of location than Africa, so why are they gaining more from this
"shift of operations" than us, Africa? Someone please help me, I need some answers.

Here is another example. Africans are playing in almost all major European football teams, and other
parts of the world, but FIFA only agreed to let us host the world cup in 2010 in South Africa. Good
news. Here is the sad part; an official of FIFA has announced on bbc.com that in the event something
goes wrong and South Africa is unable to host the World Cup, then other countries could step in,
including England, USA, Spain, Mexico, and Japan. Not even mentioning the possibility of another
African nation. Since 2010 is the golden opportunity year for Africa to host the world cup, why
couldn't another African nation be chosen to be on standby incase South Africa is unable to meet the
FIFA requirements in terms of infrastructure and logistics by then? How about Nigeria, Egypt,
Morocco, Ghana, or Senegal? Instead of England, USA, Spain, Mexico or Japan.

I'll now turning to the global institutions, and take the U.N. as a prime example. The five permanent
members of the U.N. Security Council are USA, England, France, China, and Russia. Almost all
continents of the world are representing permanently in the U.N. Security Council except Africa.
Again, why???? Why would two permanent members of the suppose-to-be world body come from
Europe and none from Africa? Nigeria for instance, is more populous than both England and France
combined. So why is Africa permanently underrepresented in the U.N Security Council? What about
the World Bank? When will it have an African as President of the institution? Oh, wait a minute! Since
its current embattled President's credibility is and future in the institution is questionable, I think this
should be an opportunity for an African to be his successor. What do you think?

I go to bed every night and wake the next day with all these questions and concerns lingering in my
mind. I hereby humbly look forward to genuine answers, remarks, corrections, and suggestions on
these matters from the noble audience.

Momodou Lamin Drammeh
Raleigh, North Carolina.

.....,,,..(GON) INTERVIEW
.Editor Demba Baldeh speaks on the tragedy at Virginia Tech

..............................................................By GON..........................May 1st,, 2007

An exclusive interview with Gainako's editor Demba Baldeh. Here at his residence in Seattle,
Washington State ,USA Demba speaks on the school tragedy at Virginia Tech that claims so
many innocence lives and the larger issue of gun control as an underlining factor in the level
of violence that many find shocking and difficult to comprehend.
(Below is the full interview.)

GON: Good morning Mr. Editor. Here we are again, having to address another
student Massacre similar to Gambian April 11th, 2000, but this time by a fellow
student (Cho Seung-Hui) and not Government orchestrated. Do you have any
comments?

Baldeh: This was really a very sad and tragic incident. My prayers and sympathy goes out to the
victims' family, friends and fellow students at Virginia Tech. It is very disturbing to see such horrible
crimes happen time and again in such an incredible society. This is certainly not supposed to happen in
a society with so much hope and opportunities for young people.

GON: What do you make of the tragic event? Could the warning signs have been seen aforetime?

Baldeh: At first I though the whole incident was just another one of those unfortunate circumstances
where a deeply trouble kid was overtaken by evil and life's overwhelming pressure which led him to
take so many innocent lives including his own. But when his videos and statements were aired by
NBC, I became very upset over why he portrayed himself as a victim and not even reflecting on the
several young promising innocent lives he was going to take away prematurely.

There were obviously serious misjudgments and missteps at several levels that could have prevented
such a horrendous crime from happening. If only people in society will take responsibility in making
sure that such suspicious activities are reported to law enforcement, then a lot of these senseless
crimes can be prevented.

With all honesty, how could a 23 year old student be able to purchase not one gun, but two within 60
days without raising any red flags? How can the gun shop owner allow such a mentally disturbed
student purchase a gun without alerting law enforcement? Did the gun shop owner really question why
such a kid (man?) would want to own a gun, or what he was going to do with it? One could argue that
the gun shop owner followed the law by doing a background check, but the reality is that if he cared
so much about what the gun would be used for, then he would have alerted law enforcement.

I further think that law enforcement made the biggest blunder in this unfortunate incident. The system
drastically failed the community especially when there were reports that a judge once declared this
Cho as a threat to himself and others. How that could be missed in his background screening is
beyond me?

GON: In the aftermath of this tragic event, a lot of people are calling for tougher gun-control laws.
What is your take on strengthening the laws?

Baldeh: It is obvious that the gun control laws have failed terribly. It is also evident that the
background check system is fundamentally flawed. What do we need to do now to prevent such
tragic events from happening? Well, let me explain one thing before I move to the need for new laws.

You know people ought to be able to differentiate between your rights as an individual citizen to own
a gun versus the right to security and protection of innocent citizens in the society. Your rights as an
individual has a direct correlation to the rights of society to live a free and secure life without fear of
harm from any individual or group of individuals. I respect the laws of this land and belief that the laws
are not made to harm society. The laws are suppose to protect society and if they fail, they should be
changed regardless of which party are in power, or whose interest is at stake. In this case and in many
other instances it is clear that the gun laws in this country have loopholes that must be filled in other to
prevent such tragedies from happening again.

I would advocate a strong enforcement of the gun control laws that we already have in the books. The
background check system should be thorough and should include nationwide database to that will
incorporate all law enforcement agencies in the nation instead of limiting it to individual states. It is easy
for someone to commit a crime in one state and move to another.

Laws like the nationwide amber alert for abducted children are a good example that can prevent such
tragedies. Within few minutes of a child being abducted in several states the police and the general
public and be on the alert for such criminals. Similar things can work in the gun control laws.

While I am mindful of the second amendment protecting citizens to own guns, it comes with
responsibility and anyone who cannot show that sign of responsibility should not be able to purchase a
gun.

We should also remove politics in such policies like gun control. When criminals or evil people are out
to kill they don't differentiate between Republican and Democrat. So therefore the issue should be
about protecting our children and society in general instead of protecting interest groups like the
National Rifle Association among other groups. These interest groups are the ones that lobby for
flawed laws or weak system to be put in place.

GON: Now that it has been established that Cho Seung -Hui was truly delusional, especially with the
kind of poetry and multimedia messages he dispatched to NBC, in your own analysis, what do you
make of Cho?

Baldeh: Am not really sure how much delusional this Cho guys was in totality. Even thought he was
delusional, he was well aware of the publicity he could get from sending those tapes to NBC. He
knew where the post office was and when exactly to mail his stuff. His display of arrogance in those
tapes did not show he was someone ill. Instead he acted like a hero displaying his guns and showing
how much damage he can cause. Without medical proof that he was truly a sick man, it would be hard
to convince me that he was delusional. Instead I think he was a trouble kid to an extent brought up in a
culture of violence. He was overcome by his anger and the system made it easy for him to commit his
crimes.

GON: Two professors and 31 students including Cho himself were victims of the trigger on that day.
How sad?

Baldeh: It is truly sad and devastating to many innocent families including Cho's own family. One
cannot over estimate the physiological impact this would have on the students of Virginia tech. Those
victims should never have died they way they died. May their souls rest in perfect peace

GON: What is your message to the American people?

Baldeh: I will emphasize that every citizen has a responsibility to police ourselves. Community
policing should be a mental alertness for each and every one of us. We should not let the liberty and
freedom we enjoy in this great country come back to hunt us. It is time we start to look out for each
other and report suspicious activities to law enforcement. We must care about our neighbors and the
people we associate with everyday being at the work place or school.

It is not about privacy or individualism; it is about protecting the very freedom we all worked so hard
to build. Freedom comes with responsibility, kindness and compassion. It therefore makes sense for
us to stop crimes before they happen. Such tragedies should not happen in a land with such hope and
promises.

My heartfelt condolence and prayers once again goes out the victims and their families. Thanks for the
opportunity to hear my view.

� Copyright, 2006-2007: Gainako On-line Newspaper. Site Maintained by Gamway Computers